Verbal Meaasges And Myths Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Verbal Meaasges And Myths Essay, Research Paper Verbal Messages and Myths Sapir Whorf hypothesis General Semantics The significance of intending [ Activity ] Q. What were the cardinal constituents of Shannon A ; Weaver # 8217 ; s information theory that were discussed last hebdomad? Myths Communication is a panacea Communication betterment is non the charming reply to everything. Sometimes it is. But there are some state of affairss where it isn # 8217 ; t. For illustration, in a relationship where a adult female is acquiring abused, stoping the relationship is likely the best class of action. Trying to listen more sympathetically to his alibis for handling her bad may merely merely foster the semblance that this relationship is deserving keeping. Similarly, sometimes more communicating aggravates differences between people and expose qualities in others that we may happen unsympathetic. Communication is a tool In the custodies of person accomplishment it can be really advantageous and can be used to assist work out many jobs. It is non nevertheless an terminal in itself. It is simply a agency to an terminal. So will communication work out all your jobs? No because non all jobs are communicating based. Communication can breakdown. I don # 8217 ; t believe that this conveys the right significance. Yes it is true we don # 8217 ; t ever receive messages the manner they were intended, nor do we ever achieve our ends. And a failure to accomplish our ends may even happen when communicating between the parties is model. [ Section from Cool Hand Luke ] Is this a failure to pass on? I believe that what we have here is non a failure to pass on, instead is is rebelliousness of an oppressive authorization. The warden has non achieved his end, viz. to coerce Luke to conform to his prison regulations. Luke # 8217 ; s act of rebelliousness is a trial of volitions and a rejection of the warden # 8217 ; s power non a communicating dislocation. We sometimes draw the misguided decision that dissension constitutes a comm unicating dislocation. I may understand your message absolutely but merely dislike what I am hearing. In this instance, what we have is a difference of sentiment non a communicating dislocation. Communication encompasses a set specific skills The accomplishments orientation to communicating assumes that if we learn a few charming things so we will be better communicators. Who agrees? Who thinks the narrative is a croc? [ The golfing gorilla narrative ] Communication does non be in a vacuity. Learning how to show your feelings might be a utile accomplishment in some cases. Expressing any feelings uncritically no affair how hurtful, flooring or self-indulgent is the act of a cranky kid non a mature grownup. Communication is besides about being critical of all factors in the communicating procedure. It is much more than acquisition merely accomplishments. Skills cognition demands to be imbedded in cognition of the whole thing, the game if it is to be genuinely utile. The survey of verb al messages are normally divided into 3 subjects: 1.Syntactics 2.Semantics 3.Pragmatics Syntactics investigates the relationship between words. Semanticss has to make with the relationship between a word and its referent. What does the word mean? Two sorts of significances are so looked at: Denotation # 8211 ; the way in which the word points and intension # 8211 ; the texture or emotional tone that goes with it. Pragmatics focal point on the consequence of the message the relationship of words to behaviour. Today, we are traveling to look at semantics and pragmatics in more item. Information theory is a syntactic theory. The significance of significance is a semantics theory. The co-ordinated direction of significance is a pragmatics theory. Taking a measure back: Definition Communication is a systematic procedure in which persons interact with and through symbols to make and construe significances. Process # 8211 ; alteration, gesture Systematic significance that it involves a group of interconnected parts that affect one another. Symbols are abstract, arbitrary and equivocal representatives of other things. Human communicating involves persons who use symbols to interact with themselves and each other. Meanings are possibly the bosom of communicating. Meanings are non intrinsic, they are created. We construct intending by working out what is represented by the symbol. Playstation General Semantics Richard # 8217 ; s theory of significance of significance is a theory that falls into the class of semantics. Semantics is the subdivision of linguistics ( the survey of linguistic communication ) that is concerned with significance and the intensions of words. Semanticists have the end of bettering mundane communicating by detecting ways in which words distort, obscure, and perplex apprehension between people. They believe that understanding what acts as a beginning for misconstruing and miscommunication so allows for developing schemes for avoiding or recti fying and in bend bettering communicating. So semanticists put frontward a series of thoughts about linguistic communication and propose redresss for misconstruing. A cat hushing is a signal of choler and warning of possible onslaught. Red berries are frequently a signal that a works is toxicant. Lightening is a signal of boom. In each of these ( hushing, ruddy berries and buoy uping ) is straight related to what they represent. A clear relationship exists between signals and their referents and the significances tend to be clear, changeless and unambiguous. General semioticians promote the belief that symbols are different from signals. Symbols such as words, art A ; music have no direct or natural relationship with what they represent. Symbols are arbitrary ways of stand foring world. E.g. footings from Full Monty # 8230 ; what does # 8220 ; the full monty # 8221 ; intend? Making the Monte Carlo, a complete breakfast of beans, toast, eggs, bacon A ; sausages, making something to extremes, traveling all the manner A ; acquiring ya pitch off. Symbols are abstract because they are non concrete or touchable. They stand for thoughts, people, state of affairss but they are non themselves the concrete thoughts, people or state of affairss. They are imperfect, partial ways of denominating the natural world of experience. Symbols are besides equivocal because their significances are ill-defined and variable. The symbol or word can intend two different things when used in a different context. For illustration # 8211 ; I love you, I love beer, I love this brace of places. Try this: Write your definitions for each of the undermentioned words: 1.Marriage 2.Faith 3.Prejudice 4.Feminist 5.Welfare 6.Affirmative action Compare your definitions with the people around you. How make your significances differ? These three belongingss of symbols ( flightiness, ambiguity + abstractness ) explain the potency for misinterpretations when we use words to pass on. Richard # 821 7 ; s significance of intending Richard # 8217 ; s uses the semantic trigon to exemplify the arbitrary and indirect relationship between words and their referents. Notice that the line between the symbol # 8220 ; cat # 8221 ; and the existent referent of a peculiar cat is dotted to bespeak that the two are merely indirectly related. There is no natural absolute connexion between the symbol and the referent. Symbols are connected to referents merely by indirect, agreed on conventions of how to utilize words. So all of this leads to the popular communicating maxim: significances are in people, non words. Richards ( 1936 ) argues that the key to apprehension ( and misconstruing ) is CONTEXT because the significances alteration as symbols move from one context to another. For Richards, context is a really wide construct. Context refers to more than specific sentences or communicating state of affairss. It besides includes ideas and feelings that we have in a state of affairs, history between communicators, the relationship within which the communicating takes topographic point and so forth. Context # 8211 ; is so the full field of experience that is related to communicating. To perplex affairs further, each individual has his or her alone field of experience that gives rise to personal significances. Possibly you have personal experiences about being fooled by linguistic communication by trusting on what you think the word or symbol agencies without look intoing the context. Selling of a milk shake to the diet witting. No existent difference between the two. The name nevertheless influenced gross revenues. Skinny Shakes vs. milk shakes What are some redresss for miscommunication? A figure of practical techniques for bettering the lucidity of communicating have been generated. 1. Adopting an extensional orientation This means detecting and paying attending to nonsubjective specifics that distinguish phenomena from one another. This allows us to anchor significa nces in observation, facts, and existent referents instead than in abstract linguistic communication and personal Fieldss of experience. Five other are: Indexing Definitions Etc Metaphor Feed frontward Indexing Misunderstandings frequently occur because people use symbols in a fixed unchanging mode when the world is that things have changed. My grandparents are a good illustration of this thought. I don # 8217 ; t cognize if this is your experience excessively, but I get Christmas nowadayss that I would hold liked when I was 12 or 15 old ages old. They seem to be caught in a clip deflection and fail to see me as being different to how I am now. Their mention to Virginia is who I was at 12 or 15 instead than who I am now. To rectify the fastness of symbols, general semioticians recommend that we index footings to specific day of the months, state of affairss and so forth. Virginia ( at 12 ) liked soft playthings and cocoa for Christmas, but Virginia ( at 20 something ) likes gold, b ubbly and house redevelopment points for Christmas. Similarly we could utilize societal state of affairss. Virginia ( socially ) is surpassing, vibrant, loud and cockamamie, but Virginia ( at work ) is professional, A ; relatively quiet. Indexing footings is a manner to remind ourselves that significances vary and change across clip and fortunes. Definitions Definitions act as symbol permutations. They are words used in topographic point of another word to explicate the idea in a individual # 8217 ; s head. Richard # 8217 ; s considers that definitions act to depict thoughts in people # 8217 ; s caputs instead than to specify a truth that is # 8220 ; out there # 8221 ; . Try this: Write down what you consider love to be. We will compare this definition. The redress recommended is to retrieve that it is neer sage to presume that what you think is what is meant and that you should do excess attempts to procure the # 8220 ; facts # 8221 ; by inquiring more inquiries or by seeki ng elucidation. Etc Another recommendation from the general semioticians is that we invariably remind ourselves that symbols are abstract and that they don # 8217 ; t gaining control all of the referent that they attempt to stand for. To remind ourselves of the rawness of symbols they suggest utilizing the term etc, continuously. For illustration: I met an understanding individual, etc. Gee, that was amazing, etc. Metaphor Richard # 8217 ; s believed that linguistic communication is metaphoric, sing it about impossible to talk more than a few sentences without utilizing a figure of address. Metaphors are the really material of linguistic communication because we think in images. The really successful Pictionary-Hoyts run was based on the usage of metaphor. Metaphors are created when we pull out 2 dissimilar images and set them together. Richard # 8217 ; s suggests that utilizing metaphors is a powerful manner to portion what you mean. Sometimes the usage of metaphor fails but it seems that the greater the evident contradiction between the images, the faster the pointer or metaphor will wing when released. What did I mean when I coined this metaphor? I am tired of people making against the wall and name it a picture. How about this one? You could direct us like an orchestra instead than standing up entirely and crushing your membranophone. [ Give out metaphor press release ] Feed forward Information theory told us that feedback is the consequence of the receiving system on the beginning. Feed frontward works in the opposite way. It is the prevenient procedure of moving as our ain first receiving system so that we can pretest the impact of our words on the audience. The thought here is that if we are more careful in be aftering communicating so possibly we will hold fewer misinterpretations that require mending. General semantics is no longer a truly dominant theory. Its flower was the 1920s to 1940s and since so it hasn # 8217 ; t received much attending. T his is slightly surprising as many of the basic thoughts inform current theory and instruction. Try this: Given the endurance of some of the constructs that general semioticians developed, why has the theory non stood the trial of clip? 1.To simplistic # 8211 ; non practical in existent life, advises speedy easy hole for extremely complex state of affairss. 2.Misrepresents the character of symbols and linguistic communication # 8211 ; general semantics positions linguistic communication as stand foring the universe or a concrete world. Therefore theoreticians who adopt this position seem to propose that all linguistic communication does is stand for what already exists. The counter statement here is that linguistic communication is non merely representational, that it is besides presentational. In other words, that linguistic communication doesn # 8217 ; t reflects world it creates the world which we believe. This position is embodied in the Sapir Whorf hypothesis and it suggests that linguistic communication constructions, our perceptual experience of world. [ Show Sapir Whorf hypothesis sketch links to the poulet A ; the egg narrative ] Representational # 8211 ; world is represented and reflected in our linguistic communication. Sapir Whorf # 8211 ; linguistic communication structures our perceptual experience of world. The construction of a civilizations linguistic communication shapes what people think and do. That is that the # 8220 ; existent universe # 8221 ; is generated, constructed around the linguistic communication of a group. [ Presentational ] Sapir Whorf # 8217 ; s theory of lingual relativity counters the premise that all linguistic communications are similar and that words simply act as impersonal vehicles to transport significance. Symbols # 8211 ; the alone capacity to pass on and we can speak ourselves into problem. 3.Lacks Applied Value # 8211 ; because intending frequently isn # 8217 ; Ts based on concrete stuff or phenomena, it isn # 8217 ; t ever possible to follow the advice given by the general semioticians. Pearce A ; Cronen # 8217 ; s CMM Coordinated direction of intending theory ( CMM ) is non an easy theory to explicate in a concise mode. This one is extremely hard to summarize. I # 8217 ; m traveling to give it a spell but I earnestly recommend that you do some out of category reading on this 1. Espec ially since it is besides a small confusing as the writers themselves are still seeking to acquire it right. So I am working from the position that you have either read the article in the 2nd edition or Ch. 6 in the 3rd edition or that you will make so. CMM theory comes from the position that as people try to do sense of their universe, they act on the footing of the significances they ascribe to events. Person in conversation co-construct their ain societal worlds. Okay, so far this isn’t galvanizing new intelligence. The following point raised is that the single readings of people may non co-occur. So communicating failures are inability of the parties to engage their disparate readings. Pearce and Cronen challenge the cause – consequence linguistic communication of behavioral scientists and borrow thoughts and footings from linguistics, doctrine and interpretative psychological science. CMM is once more a type of umbrella theory. It paved the manner for a figure of o ther theories. Today, many theoreticians hold that the articulation usage of linguistic communication creates, forms and limits the diverse societal universe which is our world. CMM is possibly the most comprehensive statement of societal building and because of this I felt it was of import for us to give it some clip. This theory is a challenge of the information transmittal theoretical account of communicating which we looked at last hebdomad. CMM is a humanistic theory. Information theory CMM Quest for knowledge Exercise of wonder Social universe as remarkable Social universe as plural Spectator cognition Participant cognition One looks from the exterior in, the other from the interior at the interior. Covering the skeleton of the theory. CMM suggests that coherency is achieved via a hierarchy of significances that provide multiple frames of mention. That regulations form and are applied to the reading, sense-making procedure. That things don’t ever run swimmingly like ant icipated which leads to mystery. Conflict is the consequence of a rhythm based on unwanted insistent forms. 1.The experience of individuals in conversation is the primary societal procedure of human life ( Talking / discoursing is everything ) . 2.Persons in conversation are engaged n linguistic communication games – ( Wittgenstein calls this word playing ) . Language is the individual most powerful tool that worlds have invented for the creative activity of societal universes. 3.Persons communicating are moving in a context, working out hoe to acquire on in life. Communication is action. We are non merely speaking about the universe, we are take parting in the universe. 4.The actions of individual in conversation are reflexively reproduced a the duologue continues. Actions bounciness back and impact us. [ Show Eschers image Chemical bond of Union. Transformation. ] We tell narratives but narratives are non merely our lives they are an effort to accomplish significance or co herency in life and they are the ways that we try to organize our lives with others. Pearce and Cronen seek to specify the range of these narratives while admiting that the narratives we tell are unfastened to many readings. CMM – address Acts of the Apostless, episodes, relationships, self-concept, civilization Speech acts merely make sense when they are considered within the multiple contexts or frames of specific episodes, the relationship, self-identity and civilization. These 4 frames form and are shaped by what is said. Try this – hold a travel a specifying these frames in braces. Each frame is briefly defined as: Episode – a communicating modus operandi with definite regulation and boundaries. Relationship – the relational context. Self-concept – images that we have of who we are Culture – our norms and values CMM suggests that these frame signifier a hierarchy of increasing influence on the narrative and that they besides reflexively impact upon the narrative. The order of importance of the frames varies across people and state of affairss and the interpretative fast one is to calculate out which context is dominant on any peculiar conversation. Coordination – the procedure by which persons collaborate in an effort to convey into being their vision of what is necessary. Logical force – logics of significance and action. Constituent regulations – regulation for significance that are ushers for coherency. Regulative regulation – regulations for action that are ushers for coherency. Mystery – unsaid narratives that remind us that life is a spot of a enigma. [ The image of it all is the Atom Serpentine Model show this as OHT, besides in 3rd edition ] Summary What do you necessitate to cognize and chew over about: Richard’s significance of intending theory and what it means The Sapir Whorf hypothesis What thoughts do these two theories contribute and what does this intend? Non-verbal is an umbrella term for a broad scope of communicating Acts of the Apostless. The label covers ; facial look, gestures, position, way of oculus regard, tone of voice, touch spacing, vesture and accoutrements and the systematic usage of clip. This is a immense country of survey and we are merely traveling to take a expression at some of it. First some footings: Kinesics – is the survey of communicating through organic structure motions. Haptics – is touch communicating. Proxemicss – is the survey of spacial messages. Under the streamer of proxemics, we will take a expression at 3 thoughts: 1.Protection theory 2.Equilibrium theory 3.Expectancy misdemeanors theory In tutorials you will take a deeper expression at anticipation misdemeanors theory. We will besides look at some interesting picture footage. Some of it is a small damaged and dated but the thoughts are still pertinent and interesting. First Up †¦ There are 5 groups or types of organic str ucture motions that add intending to communicating. 1.Emblems – straight translate to words or phrases e.g. â€Å"Come here† , wave, hitchhikers sign. 2.Illustrators – accompany and literally â€Å"illustrate† verbal messages, e.g. round manus motions when speaking of a circle, hands far apart when speaking about something big. 3.Affect shows – communicate emotional significance, e.g. looks of felicity, surprise, fright, choler, unhappiness, disgust. 4.Regulators – proctor, maintain or control the speech production of another looks, e.g. facial looks and manus gestures bespeaking, â€Å"keep going† , â€Å"slowdown† or â€Å"what else? † . 5.Adaptor’s – satisfy some demand, e.g. rubing one’s caput. Often these things all get used together. Try this: watch a section of picture 3 times and jot down what you notice – organic structure linguistic communication. First with sound: so without. Spatia l Messages or Proxemics Distinguishes four distances that correspond closely to the major types of relationships: confidant, personal, societal, public ( Hall ) . Confidant: Eye contact. You experience sound, odor, experience the other’s breath. 0 – 18 inches. Personal: 18 inches – 4 pess Social: 4 – 12 pess Public: 12 – 25 pess What are some other factors that might act upon distance? Gender – females sit and stand closer to each other than males do in same sex couples – people approach adult females more closely than they do work forces Age – distances addition with age – people maintain closer distances with equals than with individuals much older or younger Race/ethnicity – some civilizations maintain closer distances than others Personality – introverts and extremely dying people maintain greater distances than do extraverts Relationship Characteristics – acquaintance – individuals famil iar with each other maintain closer distances – wishing – people who like each other stand closer – position – the greater the position difference, the greater the difference maintained Context Characteristics – formality – the more formal the state of affairs, the greater is the infinite maintained – intent of: shorter distances are maintained for concerted interaction undertakings than for competitory undertakings – infinite – the greater the infinite, the shorter is the handiness difference Three Ideas About Space 1. Protection Theory 2. Equilibrium Theory 3. Anticipation Violations Theory Protection Theory Holds that you set up a organic structure buffer zone about yourself as protection against unwanted touching or onslaught. This organic structure buffer zone psychiatrists and expands depending on whether you feel unafraid or threatened. Secure – Shrinks – Threatened – Expands Equilibrium Theor y Holds that familiarity and distance vary together: – the greater the familiarity, the greater the distance – the lower the familiarity, the greater the distance In my sentiment, this theory doesn’t suggest anything for a wow response. It merely suggests that you maintain close distances with those whom you have close interpersonal relationships and that you maintain greater distances with whom you do non. After â€Å"ragging† the thought a spot for it being obvious or common sense, I think it’s of import to do some brief remark about it. Expectancy Violations Theory Expectancy Violations Theory ( Burgoon ) is a theoretical account about personal infinite misdemeanors. Burgoon defines infinite as the â€Å"invisible variable volume of infinite environing an person that defines that individual’s preferred distance from others† . She says that the size and form of our personal infinite depends on our cultural norms, and single penchant s but that the infinite is ever a via media between the conflicting attack – turning away demands that we have as worlds for association and privateness. Unlike the four distances originating from Hall’s research, Burgoon doesn’t suggest that we should conform distance or usage of infinite with position of relationship, context and so on. What she says is that misdemeanors of these personal infinite â€Å"rules† are eliciting. She besides suggests that at times go againsting societal norms and personal outlooks is a superior scheme to conformance. She says that â€Å"the greater the disagreement between our outlook and world, the greater the stimulation† . The stimulation or the consequence of stimulation could be really different in each case. On this issue Burgoon suggests that your response to a infinite misdemeanor will come down to comprehend reward potency or wages valency. Reward valency of a communicator is the amount of the positive and ne gative properties that the individual brings to the brush, plus the possible he/she has to honor in the hereafter. Distance misdemeanors by themselves are extremely equivocal and necessitate â€Å"their victims† to seek the societal context for other hints as to their significances. Status, ability, good expressions ; these types of things enhance perceived reward valency. Wordss pass oning credence, liking, trust, grasp, are besides perceived every bit good. So a misdemeanor embedded in a host of favorable signals are perceived positively. â€Å"Ugliness† , disinterest, disapproval, rejection are turn offs and when they are portion of a breach of infinite etiquette we are more immune or negative with our response. Now Burgoon has continued analyzing and 15 plus old ages down the path has found some ‘universals’ which are deserving sing when you interact with other people. 1. She no longer thinks that these misdemeanors are merely about infinite, instead n ow these misdemeanors follow with gestural behaviors in general. 2. Some behaviors have clear significances, some don’t. The theoretical account merely comes into drama when the significance of the non-verbal behavior is unsure. If the non-verbal message is clear so we don’t bother analyzing farther. 3. Recognition that non-rewarding communicators fare best when they conform to others’ outlooks. When in Rome, base ( behave ) where the Roman’s expect you to stand. 4. Elimination of the threshold of dainty. Burgoon originally postulated that this threshold existed. Subsequently, she has dropped it from the theoretical account as she neer found research support for it. What she did happen was that close brushs of the surprising sort are welcome, supplying the lawbreaker is viewed positively. 5. Awareness of the surprising potency of a distance excessively far. Burgoon’s really foremost experiment found that positively valenced communicators who kept t heir distance achieved their ends better than those who set up normal conversation spacing. At first she thought the infinite contributed to comprehend higher position. Now she thinks it has to make with rousing and doing the individual to seek the context for account. I guess what she’s stating is don’t arouse person if you want them to merely make something without oppugning the direction or seeking for secondary messages. Where we are today: Gestural Messages — the mark Semiotics What do marks intend? How do marks alter intending? Do all marks have intending? Semiotic Theory The survey of marks – The nature of marks – Their impact on society – The Torahs that govern them The scientific discipline of the prevarication – All marks stand for something else – Signs can be used to state prevarications or the truth How marks are differ from words Richards’ Meaning of Meaning Theory: Wordss are symbols without intending Bart hes’ Semiotic Theory: Signs ever have intending Barthes’ Semiotic Theory: The mark is its intending Sign = signifier + signified – Signifier is the image you see – Signified is underlying concept A semiotic system is a tightly woven, closed system Mythic or Connotative Sign Systems Signs that are built off preexistent systems Example: Queen – denotes â€Å"Monarch, ruler† – connotes â€Å"oppression† – connotes â€Å"figurehead† â€Å"Model† A theoretical account is a individual with a organic structure well-suited to exposing apparels to their best advantage ( Indication: theoretical account is marketing tool ) What do these 2nd order marks make? â€Å"They bless the frequently helter-skelter and unfair province of a society by doing it appear natural, inevitable and eternal.† They support the civilization because they â€Å"transform history into nature† . Why analyze them? To â€Å"deconst ruct† : – Not to happen original significance, which is lost – To expose their falsity – To bring out the implicit in cultural values which they support Do all marks have intending? â€Å"Empty† marks: – May still exist but are replaced by other cultural icons – World leaders with aces Business Writing Some points: What is at interest – to whom? Should you direct a message? What channel should you utilize? What should you state? How should you state it? Who is your audience? What impact? What objections or reactions? What else? Organize your information to suit your audiences, your intents, and the state of affairs. Make you document visually ask foring. Revise your bill of exchange to make a friendly, concern like, positive manner. Edit your bill of exchange for standard English ; dual cheque names and Numberss. 339