Adam Smiths Moral Sentiments Essay example

Adam Smiths Moral Sentiments Essay example Adam Smiths Moral Sentiments Essay example 10/19/2013 Business Ethics & Society Adam Smith’s Moral Sentiments Part 2 The reading on Moral Sentiments by Adam Smith first starts of the definition of a prudent man. Prudent man is based on a self- interest, which means taking care of oneself. Prudent man are trying to keep out of harm, care for their own, they are sincere but not so vocal about things, reserved in regards to others, they limit friendship by not passionate but transitory affection, they are conservative financially, modest, they feel horro when being disgrace to others, they tell nothing but the truth, very cautious in actions, never makes rash opinions concerning others, conversations are always inoffensive and they place themselves below of others. Prudent man are naturally contented with his situations, gradually relax, no anxiety to change comfortable situations. Since they are based around self-interest, prudent man are not willing to take any responsibility which his duty doesn’t impose upon him according to Smith. We judge that t heir sentiment is justified when sentiments with another person when the person is alone. Sympathy does not give judgments. Judgments only being considered when there is a difference in attention and when there is awareness between individuals, but if people agree on a judgment then it is not being distinguished. Another way when other’s judgment is different from us is when we can take it as admiration. Smith explained how we take values to judgments when it is similar to our own judgments and therefore we aspect those judgments. Prudent man sympathy will never go to the point of violence of whoever is in those shoes, also of our own safety and comfort. We go into sympathetic state in ourselves when we are constantly intruded. If you are suffering or if anyone is, the feelings can be soften by sentiment from another person, which this is acceptable fort the peace and harmony of the society. As Smith say, society and conversations is the best remedy for recovering the mind. S mith stated that there is to distinction, of one, the person who is notably concerned. Which is a person’s emotion can be awaken by an object. And there is the spectator who is emotionally awakened by watching over and sympathizing. These two types of different people have two sets of different virtues. The person who is notably concerned is self-denial and self-government. The person who is a spectator shows blunt contempt and considerate humanity of coming into the sympathy of the person principally concerned. Smith concludes that perfection of human nature is having this mutual sympathy by feeling more for others than for one self. The degree of passion can sympathize is up to a medium level, which depends on what the passion or emptions is being covey. According to Smith, passions will be considered appropriate or inappropriate to changeable degrees subject to the degree which the spectator is able to sympathize, which what the purpose is to establish which passions evoke sympathy and which don’t and therefore knowing if it’s appropriate or inappropriate. I agree to what Smith is conveying in his readings. Being a prudent man is not enough, not enough to be noticeable or at least stand out in a crowd in any point. As Smith mentioned, prudence people deserve cold esteem, respect but not admiration and it is not enough. Prudence is boring, not out of norm or as I say it is â€Å"too† normal. Surrounding people will never going to be satisfied. Prudence don’t give enough responsible towards others, they are too self-interest and just lack of care for others. In this society where it is so much easier to converse and connect to people, it is almost kind of impossible to have lack of care or too much self-interest. Don’t you want to see how it can help, effect or even

Communication log #1 Essays - Animation, Angry Kid, Filmmaking

Communication log #1 Essays - Animation, Angry Kid, Filmmaking Communication log #1 Assignment #4 The first person I interviewed about their problem in communication is my dad. He said that his biggest problem is being impatient and demanding sometimes. H e expects an answer immediately and doesn't give the other person the chance to take his/her time to talk . He feels like the other person does not comprehend what he is trying to convey to them. I believe my Dad needs to take his time in trying to communicate with others and give them the opportunity to answer at his/her pace. I myself find myself at times finishing other people's sentences when they speak too slow, but know that I can't speak for them. The second person I interviewed about their problem in communication is my mom. She said she finds it hard to talk to people she doesn't know well. She doesn't know what to talk about with people she just met. She is not the kind of person to approach strangers and speak to them randomly. However, she tries to solve this problem by being more open and friendlier. I can relate to not being able to communicate with people I just met. The third person I interviewed about their problem with communication is my middle sister, Gabby. Her name says it all; she talks a bit much at times . She doesn't think before she talks and people that don't know her can assume she is rude. She tries to solve this by restraining herself from saying certain things and being more mindful of what she says. I have always been respectful of others and try not to say offensive things. The fourth person I interviewed about their problem with communication is my aunt, Norma. She tries to dominate all conversations and doesn't give others the chance to speak. She is always talking about herself and her children in a boastful manner. She is trying to learn how to be less arrogant and letting other speak too. I can't relate to my aunt because I enjoy listening to other people talk about them more than I like to speak about myself. The fifth person I interviewed about their problem with communication is my older sister, Jasmin. She was born talking and then became a teacher for elementary grade school children. She feels like she has the authority to always speak and that everyone else should always listen to her. She tries to let others be in command of the conversations at times. I can't relate to this problem because I like to let others talk too.

Outline the Main Types of Business Structure that Existed in Britain Research Paper

Outline the Main Types of Business Structure that Existed in Britain Between the World Wars, Indicating their Strengths and Weaknesses - Research Paper Example The different types of business structures in Britain between World War I (1914-1918) and World War II (1939-1945) included family firms, personal capitalism, cartelization, a formation of mergers, diversification, and growth of modern industrial empires. The purpose of this paper is to outline the main types of business structures during the inter-war years, indicating their strengths and weaknesses. During the early period of the interwar years, many British product markets were characterized by fragmentation, as companies attempted to differentiate their product separately from others’ products. Managerial and supervisory systems were weak, managers were poorly educated and trained, and the levels of managerial hierarchy were inadequately demarcated resulting in poor coordination and efficiency. According to Westall, late nineteenth century businessmen had the usual three strategy options: competition, collusion or integration. Each option had further choices for example, competition could be by non-price means such as a differentiation of products to make them more appealing to consumers. Collusion referred to cooperation between businesses to raise prices and profitability. Integration was the process by which companies joined together to accommodate larger shares of economic activity internally rather than rely on market mediation. The term family firm refers to various types of owner-managed firms.